Islam like other religions, does not encourage inter
social and inter ethnic marriages. In its fundamental form, it abhors music
and dancing; it condemns to death any Moslem marrying outside the religion.
Much of the above could be contradicted by many Muslim
sects. Many Muslim countries have sexy belly dancers – do they regard this as
an aberration of Islamic standards or a Turkish embellishment, adopted widely
by Arabic nations?
When we talk about Islam do we mean Arabic or attitudes
that go far beyond Arabic as the Islamic religion which exist in many
countries far removed from Arabia – Serbia, China, Pakistani, Bangladesh,
Malaysia, Indonesia, India, etc.
This is the knob of the confusion of dealing with
Islam. It is never clear when one is dealing with Islam that in reality
you are dealing with Arab/Moors. (There are millions of Arab Christians
– Egypt, Lebanon, Syria). Nevertheless the Arab Moslems seem to be united in
their suspicion of Westernization. This is ironic because it was the West
that created most of the countries of the Middle East: the UAE, Saudi Arabia,
Syria, Jordan, Iraq as recent ago as the 1930s. Is this then the explanation
for their hatred of the West?
No peace-makers; very many war makers – a maxim true of
Moslems today.
The centrality of the doctrine of love (same as in Islam?)
but in Christianity goes further; it becomes the role of Christ coming to
sacrifice himself out of love for humanity. That doctrine is the basis
of the tolerance and equality – concepts that find fine expression not only
in democracy but in respect for human lives and ultimately equality and
freedom.
The stress of equal human rights is the basis of the end
of all discrimination, colonialism, neo-imperialism and what ironically gives
Moslem people the support, so necessary, when they are perceived to have been
discriminated against by the West. I do not find a corresponding ethos in
Islam for downtrodden people who are not Moslems. Nor do I find a
corresponding revulsion felt and expressed when Muslims clearly violate this
inviolable principle of human rights and equality.
Indeed the religious attitude to blacks, women, and the
underprivileged is basically that these groups deserve what they get, that
the Holy Prophet saw these glaring inconsistencies but pronounced little
about them. And because he did not, and since Islam is a way of life,
barbarous treatment of the downtrodden, the criminal, the Kafir, women sit
comfortably with regimes that stone women, cut off hands, etc. This is
done in the name of religion. Where are the reformists within Islam who
argue that behaviours such as described above are basically inhuman?
Islam is not the only religion that has practised untold inhumanity against
its own people, and strangers but those regimes have long past and have no hope
of resuscitation. How could you imprison somebody for watching volley
ball? Stone a woman for marrying outside her religion? (Before Western
Christians begin to feel superior it was not so long ago when they killed a
man for stealing a chicken!)
It is instructive that these are not issues of great
movements in Islamic countries. It is true the West cherry picks these
embarrassing moments to criticize one regime or the other. But my pain
is that I cannot really discuss any of these matters with my Islamic friends:
I am certain they do not discuss them among themselves.
Moslem women, I am told are satisfied with their roles
within the Islamic pantheon. I am further astonished that more women have
become Presidents in clearly Islamic States than in non-Muslims ones.
These facts fly in the face of fears of wholesome discrimination against
women. In Nigeria here, for reasons too complex to go into, we have a
plethora of female judges and Permanent Secretaries and Ministers without
that doing violence to Islam.
Perhaps that is the rub: Islam is not evolving enough to
accept modern human rights for all not only for the exceptional. Other
religions have people who interpret doctrine and thereby integrate it with
“modern life”- thus you have at the pinnacle of Catholicism – the Pope, the
Anglicans – the Archbishop.
Ideally the Islamic Government will be a theocracy- the
most learned to be Caliph. But there is and will be a role for the Holy
man, the itinerant, preacher, until they settled. Nigeria has seen its Questa
of holy men from Mali, Senegal, etc who have our political leaders in a
vice-grip through Islamic ministrations. No one believes that the Sultan of
Arabia is the Caliph; there is no single interpreter of Islam, an intercessor
between Mohammed and Man.
The body of writings of Islam could be used to justify any
atrocity provided it is understood as a Jihad. Is fighting Boko Haram a
Jihad? What is Haram in Nigeria is clearly not Haram in Qatar or Serbia let
alone the justification of unheard of barbarity – taking 260 girls from a
school – for what?? It is true that our Muslim leaders have been
condemning Boko Haram, but surely this goes beyond mere condemnation.
When similar unorthodox religion arose in Waco, Texas, USA, and in Guyana the
first line of attack was to infiltrate them by the security forces and in a
botched attempt to bring down Waco a mini war ensued killing several dozens.
My problem with the Muslims in Nigeria and their response
to Boko Haram is that they are not sufficiently angry. They have to do
something beyond pious declarations in newspapers. There are some who believe
that the whole Boko Haram imbroglio is financed and supported by so called
respectable Northern Leaders. Nobody in the 21st century captures
schoolgirls, and forcefully turns them into Moslem so as to marry them off!!
Nothing is more self justifying than religion but even so,
in 2014, all conflicts in the world except Ukraine is Muslim based, backed
and perpetrated – unfortunately it is Moslem killing Moslems, but they have
shown an extraordinary capacity to kill non-Moslems outside their own
countries.
To what end? There is an under current belief that
these wars in the Middle East, Africa – are aimed at dismantling the
solutions the West imposed on the regions between 1914 and 1936 – the
creation of Saudi Arabia, the Emirates, Syria, Jordan, Palestine, Algeria,
Libya, Tunisia, Egypt, Nigeria Mali, Chad, Niger, Cameron, etc. In short, to
dress these incessant insurgencies in some geopolitical garment. ISIS
has now claimed territory. The War Lords in Libya are claiming
territory just as Boko Haram is doing in Nigeria.
Islam, I am told, means peace. If this is so, then
there is little Islam in the world today and Islam has a very odd way of
showing peace. All areas of the world where there is conflict and war –
Islam is there – Algeria, Libya, Egypt, Israel/Palestine, Yemen, Sudan,
India/Pakistan, Pakistan/Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Turkey and Nigeria.
Christianity and Islam are the two religions in which we worship a Man God,
but He is unrepresented by any object and His teachings are embodied in one
book, the Koran or the Bible.
Moslems believe that the book of the
Koran itself is Holy because it contains the words dictated by Allah to
Mohammed who faithfully recorded His words. I believe these basic tenets are
also accepted by Judaism – one God, unrepresented and unrepresentable, whose
words, Moses copied and is kept as the Torah, in the holiest of places.
Both Judaism and Islam had earlier on found cause to fight
Christianity which by and large is today represented by the West. Of
late, fundamentalism and radicalism has tended to find expression in
anti-western feelings; the disgruntled British and American citizens
descended from the Middle East have been finding common cause and going to
fight in the Middle East.
• To be continued tomorrow
• Dr. Cole, Nigeria’s
former Ambassador to Brazil, wrote from Lagos.
|
Tuesday, 10 February 2015
Cole: Islam, radicalism and threat to peace (1)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment